Page 60 - 1619 Project Curriculum
P. 60

The 1619   Project

          anything that touched their region-  South (except for Florida),   where the     inextricably tied to our system of     designed to target black North Caro-

          al prerogatives.             white people of the region — among     slavery.   And while the racial content     linians with ‘‘almost surgical preci-




            Anti-lynching laws and some     the most conservative in the coun-  of that ideology has attenuated over     sion,’’ according to the federal judges

          pro-labor legislation died at the     try, a direct legacy of slavery   and the     time, the basic framework remains:     who struck the law down.     When, in






          hands of lawmakers from the       society it built — flocked to the candi-  fear of rival political majorities; of     2016, Democrats overcame these


          ‘‘Solid   South’’ who took advantage     date   who stood against the constitu-  demographic ‘‘replacement’’; of a     obstacles to take back the governor’s


          of Senate rules like the filibuster to     tional demands of the black-freedom     government that threatens privilege     mansion, the Republican-controlled



          eff  ectively enact Calhoun’s idea of   movement. Goldwater    may have     and hierarchy.   Legislature tried to strip power from



             a concurrent majority against leg-  insisted that there are ‘‘some rights     The past 10   years of Republican     the office, to prevent Democrats


          islation that threatened the South-  that are clearly protected by   valid     extremism is emblematic.   The Tea     from reversing their eff  orts to rig






                                                                 ’
          ern racial status quo; the spirit of     laws and are therefore ‘civil rights,’     ’   Party billed itself as a reaction to     the game.

          nullification lived on.   When North-  but he also declared that ‘‘states’     debt and spending, but a close look     A similar    thing happened in



          ern liberal Democrats added a civil     rights’’ were ‘‘disappearing   under     shows it   was actually a reaction to an     Wisconsin.    Under  Scott Walker,


          rights plank   to the party platform     the piling sands of absolutism’’ and     ascendant majority of black people,     the governor at the time,     Wiscon-





          at the 1948 presidential convention,     called Brown   v. Board an ‘‘unconsti-  Latinos,   Asian-Americans and liberal     sin Republicans gave themselves

          in an eff  ort to break the Southern     tutional trespass into the legislative     white people. In their survey-based     a structural advantage in the State


          conservatives’ hold on the party,     sphere of government.’’ ‘‘I therefore     study of the movement, the political     Legislature through aggressive gerry-


          35 delegates from Mississippi and     support all eff  orts by the States,     scientists Christopher S. Parker   and     mandering.   After the Democratic





          Alabama walked out in protest: the     excluding   violence, of course,’’ Gold-  Matt A. Barreto show     that Tea Party     candidate toppled  Walker    in the



          prologue to the ‘‘Dixiecrat Revolt’’     water   wrote in ‘‘The Conscience of     Republicans   were motivated ‘‘by the     2018 governor’s race, the Republican

          that began the conservative migra-    a Conservative,’’ ‘‘to preserve their     fear and anxiety associated   with the     majority in the Legislature rapidly





          tion into the eventual embrace of     rightful powers over education.’’   perception that ‘real’   Americans are     moved to limit the new governor’s
          the Republican Party.          Later,    when key civil rights     losing their country.’’   power   and weaken other statewide




            Calhoun’s idea that states could     questions had been settled by law,     The scholars   Theda Skocpol and     offices    won by Democrats.  They


          veto the federal government   would     Buckley  would essentially renounce     Vanessa   Williamson came to a simi-  restricted the governor’s ability to

                  well following the decision
          return as                     these   views, praising the movement     lar conclusion in their contempora-  run public-benefit programs and set


                  v


          in Brown     . Board of Education, as     and criticizing race-baiting dema-  neous study   of the movement, based     rules on the implementation of state



          segregationists announced ‘‘massive     gogues like George C. Wallace. Still,     on an ethnographic study   of Tea     laws.   And they robbed the governor



          resistance’’ to federal desegregation     his initial impulse — to give political     Party activists across the country.     and the attorney general of the power





          mandates and sympathizers defend-  minorities a   veto not just over policy     ‘‘Tea Party resistance to giving more     to continue, or end, legal action





          ed   white Southern actions with ideas     but over   democracy itself — reflect-  to categories of people deemed     against the Aff  ordable Care Act.





          and arguments that cribbed from Cal-  ed a tendency   that would express     undeserving is more than just an     Michigan Republicans took an






          houn and recapitulated enslaver   ide-  itself again and again in the con-  argument about taxes and spend-  almost identical course of action after





          ology for modern   American politics.     servative politics he ushered into     ing,’’ they note in ‘‘The Tea Party     Democrats in that state managed

          ‘‘The central question that emerges,’’     the   mainstream, emerging when     and the Remaking of Republican     to   win executive office, using their





          the National Review founding editor     political, cultural and demographic     Conservatism’’; ‘‘it is a heartfelt cry     gerrymandered legislative majority




          William F. Buckley   Jr. wrote in 1957,     change threatened a narrow, exclu-  about   where they fear ‘their coun-  to   weaken the new Democratic gov-



          amid congressional debate over the     sionary   vision of American democ-  try’ may   be headed.’’ And Tea Party     ernor and attorney general. One pro-










             first Civil Rights Act, ‘‘is whether the     racy.   Writing in the 1980s and ’90s,     adherents’ ‘‘worries about racial and     posed bill, for   example, would have



          white community in the South is   Samuel Francis — a polemicist   who     ethnic minorities and overly   entitled     shifted oversight of campaign-finance



          entitled to take such measures as are     would eventually   migrate to the very     young people,’’ they   write, ‘‘signal a   law from the secretary   of state to a





          necessary to prevail, politically and     far right of American conservatism     larger   fear about generational social     six-person   commission with mem-

          culturally, in areas   which it does not     —   identified this dynamic in the con-  change   in America.’’   bers nominated by the state Repub-




          predominate numerically?  The sober-  text of David Duke’s campaign for     To stop this change and its     lican and Democratic parties, a move


          ing answer is   yes — the white com-  governor   of Louisiana:   political consequences, right-wing     designed to produce deadlock   and




          munity is so entitled because, for   the     ‘‘Reagan conservatism, in its     conservatives have embarked  keep elected Democrats from revers-


          time being, it is the advanced race.’’     innermost meaning, had little to     on a project to nullify oppo-  ing previous decisions.




          He continued: ‘‘It is more important     do with    supply-side  economics     nents and restrict the scope of     The Republican rationale for tilt-

          for any community, anywhere in     and spreading democracy. It had     democracy. Mitch McConnell’s     ing the field in their permanent favor











          the   world, to affirm and live by civ-  to do with the awakening of a peo-  hyper-obstructionist rule in the Sen-  or, failing that, nullifying the results

          ilized standards, than to bow to the     ple who face political, cultural and   ate is the most high-profile example     and limiting Democrats’ power as

          demands of the numerical majority.’’   economic   dispossession, who are     of this strategy, but it’s far from the     much as possible, has a familiar ring





            It is a strikingly   blunt defense of     slowly beginning to glimpse the     most egregious.     to it. ‘‘Citizens from every   corner of



                                 white
          Jim Crow and affirmation of      fact of dispossession and what dis-  In 2012, North Carolina Republi-  Wisconsin deserve a strong legis-


          supremacy   from the father of the     possession will mean for them and     cans   won legislative and executive     lative branch that stands on equal

          conservative movement. Conser-  their descendants, and   who also are     power for   the first time in more than a   footing   with an incoming adminis-





          vatives drove the groundswell that     starting to think about reversing the     century.   They used it to gerrymander     tration that is based almost solely in






          made Senator Barry   Goldwater of     processes and powers responsible     the electoral map and impose new     Madison,’’   one Wisconsin Republi-
          Arizona, an opponent of the Civil     for their dispossession.’’   restrictions on   voting, specifi cally     can said following the party’s lame-




          Rights    Act, the 1964 Republican                        aimed at the state’s African-American     duck power grab.   The speaker of the


          Party    nominee for president. He     There is a homegrown ideology  voters. One such restriction, a     State   Assembly, Robin Vos, made




          lost in a landslide but won the Deep     of reaction in the United States,     strict voter-identifi cation   law, was     his point more explicit. ‘‘If you took




                                                                  54
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65